I'd heard of Linux before, and had even installed in on an old machine. But when I booted into it, I ended up with a command prompt that wouldn't take any of my old DOS commands. I gave up on it. Recently though, I'd heard some good things about Ubuntu and decided to try it out. Ultimately, I wondered if it would help with my fractal rendering by eliminating a lot of the bloat-ware in memory that is commonly called Windows. I have to say that I was a pretty shocked at the outcome.
I downloaded a free copy of the latest version of Ubuntu and burned it on a CD. When I booted to it, I was fairly surprised at how intuitive the graphic interface was. At that point, I decided it was worth installing it on my laptop in a dual-boot mode so that I could choose to boot into Windows or Ubuntu. After shrinking my primary partition and installing Ubuntu on the leftover space, I looked in the software repository and told it to install Wine (a program that allows you to run Windows applications), browsed to my Windows folder for Apophysis, and was pleasantly surprised again at the fact that it ran right away. The initial launch time was a tad bit longer, but it ran like a charm. The big test came when I loaded up a flame and told it to render. In native Windows Vista, the most memory I could squeeze out of my 1GB of RAM for a render was 490MB. Usually though, I have some other processes running and the figure is about 350MB. When I loaded the same flame up in Apophysis running on Ubuntu though, I had 765MB free...and that is with a chat application and Gmail alert program running in my system tray as well.
What this means is that when I render my fractals in a large resolution for sale on ShutterStock (submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=1…), I rarely have to resort to multiple strips. This saves a tremendous amount of time. I haven't actually run any speed tests, but I would not be surprised if the rendering time was faster as well.
Anyway, the bottom line is that if you have a couple gig of free hard drive space and only a gig (or less) of RAM, you should probably check out Ubuntu. It's free, and the hour or two that it takes you to set it up could very well be recouped by the time savings in your first renders. The whole process of downloading the Ubuntu CD, re-partitioning my hard drive, and installing Ubuntu and Wine only took about 45 minutes. The total cost, including time, was 45 minutes. Definitely fit my budget.
If anyone wants more detailed step-by-step instructions on what went into this, let me know.
PS. I just hit a milestone on ShutterStock (submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=1…). In my first 21 days, I've sold over 200 images and am guaranteed a first check of at least $75. I'm thrilled! If you haven't checked out ShutterStock (submit.shutterstock.com/?ref=1…), you should. It is free for artists/photographers to join, they'll take just about anything that is categorized properly and isn't noisy, and the earnings add up fairly quickly.
Just tell him that a free download of Ubuntu (of Kubuntu) is a lot cheaper than upgrading your memory. LOL
Is it compatible with everything Windows is compatible with??
I've only tried a couple of programs. The only ones I've tried that didn't work were some that sat in the Windows system tray and monitored things. I think these rely too heavily on windows hooks or events. The regular applications ran though. I have heard that there is an extensive list on the Wine web site that lists applications that work, mostly work, or don't work when running under Linux.
I'm running nothing but Linux Mint 4.0 Daryna which is based on Ubuntu myself. Linux is soooo much nicer.
Haven't heard of Linux Mint 4.0 Daryna before. I'll have to check it out. I started out with Gnome in Ubuntu 7.10 last Thursday, then tried out KDE, but I'm all for checking out new stuff. Any benefits of Linux Mint 4.0 Daryna over the two flavors I've already played with?
Linux Mint is a modified version of Ubuntu and I use the Gnome version. As for the benefits over regular Ubuntu the only thing I can remember from the one time I installed Ubuntu was that Mint had all my video card drivers and most proprietary codecs (mp3, dvd, etc.) pre-installed. I know I gave up on Ubuntu 6.10 because I couldn't get it to go to a 1280x1024 screen res, but Mint installed and did everything for me. I love it.
I'll give it a shot. I'm downloading the KDE torrent now, but it is going to take 20+ hours.
Is it worth it? How is it different from Gnome or KDE?
Gnome & KDE aren't distributions, they are the kernel of the operating system like DOS or NT are for Windows. Linux Mint is just a version of Linux much like XP, Vista, and Server 2003 are versions of Windows. I prefer Linux Mint with Gnome, but I couldn't say why I like Gnome over KDE if someone asked me.